Samizdat, Five Year Plan
In 1986 the Czechoslovak Communist Central Committee approved its Eighth Five Year Plan since 1948, which stayed in effect, with modifications, until 1990. The plan built upon the East Bloc practices of following the Soviet command-economy model and emphasizing heavy industry over consumer goods. For example, the plan called for industrial output to grow 15.8% for the five year period (roughly 3.1% per year). During the same time personal consumption was to increase by 11.9% (roughly 2.4% annually). Industries for machine building, electronics, chemicals and metallurgy were to receive special attention, as were the construction of nuclear power plants and natural-gas facilities (the latter stemmed from environmental concerns). Overall, the Eighth Five Year Plan called for the Czechoslovak economy to grow 3.5% per year. These targets were higher than what had been achieved during the period of the Seventh Five Year Plan. Most of this new growth (92% to 95% of it) was to come from improved worker productivity, thereby placing more pressure on ordinary people; the much smaller part of it was to come from decreases in production costs, especially the cost of fuel. Modifications were made to the plan, especially once it became clear that Gorbachev would not be removed from power. One modification in 1987 entailed the creation of 120 enterprises that were expected to achieve centrally planned goals, but could independently decide how to arrive at them.
The following document on toilet paper illustrates the impact of the Soviet-style command economies on the everyday life of ordinary people in the East Bloc. It also illustrates the existence of public criticism of government management of the economy.
This source is a part of the Everyday Life in Eastern Europe in the 1980s teaching module.
Samizdat, Five Year Plan
Ostensibly it's about a trifle. There will be no state upheaval for such fiddlefaddle. And there will
be the joke: Do you why there isn't enough toilet paper? Because they plan for the head and never for the
other end of the body. Or: the planners demonstrated the brilliant foresight, that where there slowly won't
be food, toilet paper won't be necessary. In the sundrygoods stores, drugstores, and obviously in the
papergoods stores there appeared signs reading "There is no toilet paper."
It's not only that there isn't any, but that there won't be the necessary amount for a long time. [. . .]
The total demand for toilet paper in the CSSR is roughly 35,000 tons. According to the plan, in the Czech
lands 4,750 tons are to be produced and in Slovakia 32,750 tons. That should have richly sufficed, but at
the end of last year Slovak production fell short by 500 tons. Thus, because before Christmas no one
dared reduce deliveries for small shops, nonretail appropriations were cut (health facilities, spas,
restaurants, offices, institutes and other concerns). It all began here.
Shoppers went to the stores and quickly the paper disappeared from the shelves. That incited a
panic, from which demand rose 10 to 15 percent, a phenomenon we also already know from the sale of
other goods. People started to build reserves; each member of the family had the job of finding at least
one roll. Soon even napkins and paper tissues disappeared, and toilet paper in work places and public
concerns was stolen, because whoever didn't steal received a hit—and one that truly stung. In the midst of
it all a report arrived, saying that the Harmanecká paper mill in Slovakia burned down. n truth, about 80
to 100 tons of raw materials for the production of rolls burned, but that's hardly the reason for the general
The reality is that 14 years ago Slovak enterprises gained control over the monopolization of the
production of toilet paper, arguing that production lacked good prospects in obsolete Czech operations.
For this reason, production in the Czech lands is going down from year to year: 4790 tons in 1986; 4782
tons in 1987; 4750 tons in this year's previouslymentioned plan. And it's supposed to continually be cut,
so long as the present situation doesn't demand a decision to transfer toiletpaper production to the new
Moravian factory in Paskova or to southBohemian Loučovici, but all that's far off. . . .
The present shortage of toilet paper is being fixed by making available foreigncurrency means
from Ligna to the tune of 20 million crowns for purchases in Austria. . . . The shortage in the nonretail
sector is being mitigated through deliveries from China (about 1000 tons), but one roll arrives with a tax
of 10 Crowns for overseas shipping, and a tenpercent lower tax for land transport. The paper is quality
and, naturally, a pack of four will cost 40 crowns. Exactly since October 1 this much toilet paper was
promised per month to pensioners, since the Chinese toilet paper is going to the nonretail sector with the
proper state appropriation. This won't fully cover nonretail needs. 2000 tons will be lacking and still
there will be buying in retail stores and stealing in public concerns. Always round and round.
As in a drop of water, here [in toilet paper] economic ignorance and decrepitude are reflected.
There's no point to use as an excuse the Slovak monopoly, to dramatize such already tense relations, to
use as an excuse federalization and the defectiveness of interministerial agreements, which devour so
much paper. The recorded limit on supply should above all be tied to the incompetence of the decisionmakers. It's just that who would remain in the center [of government]? Even such a ostensible trifle, like
how there can be a supply (or rather shortage) of toilet paper shows the depth and intricacy of the
problems, in which the restructuring of the economy is bogged down and marking time. What weightier
tasks do we not deal with every day like we do with "bogpaper".
It's known that our annual consumption of paper is 80 kilograms per resident. At the same time in
Western European countries it is 200 and in the USA it is 340. But when it comes to the production of
iron, we outran all of these advanced states long ago. Thus this solution is offered: the use of a wire brush
for a certain function.
"Why There's No Toilet Paper [Proč není toaletní papír]," trans. Cathleen M. Giustino, Lidové noviny,
June 1988, no. 6, 8.
"Why There's No Toilet Paper [Proč není toaletní papír]," trans. Cathleen M. Giustino, Lidové noviny, June 1988, no. 6, 8.